Thursday, January 26, 2017

I Stand With Standing Rock

Unless you've been living under a rock recently, you've probably heard about Standing Rock:




On a more serious note, however, you might have heard of Standing Rock... But are you aware of what is going on?

A brief overview of the facts:
  • The Dakota Access Pipeline is an approximately 1,172 mile-long underground oil pipeline project that seeks to take oil from the Bakken field in North Dakota to the Patoka, Illinois oil tank
  • The pipeline would originally cross under the Missouri river, but was redirected to avoid a greater impact to the Sioux water supply
  • The original route was assessed as posing "great concern" to the local water supply by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 2016, and needed to be redirected
  • There is a massive Native American undertaking at Standing Rock- mostly by the Sioux tribe, but also Lakȟóta, Mayan and Pipil representatives
  • The other projected pipeline construction, Pipeline XL, is undergoing similar backlash from Native American groups in both Alberta, Canada and North Dakota, as it threatens both fragile ecosystems and sacred burial ground.



Why push ahead with it?

It was projected that between the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Pipeline XL projects, there would be over 28,000 jobs created. However, one of the principal reasons why the Obama administration didn't go ahead was because around 80% of these jobs would be short-term only: construction workers, early-stage project developers, etc. The Trump administration, on the other hand, has just signed an executive order (as of January 25th, 2017) to "expedite the completion of the Keystone XL project" and a Presidential Memorandum to push ahead with the drilling required for the Dakota Access Pipeline. 

The Protest

Along with the critical threat to the environment, protesters have mentioned the desecration of heritage sites, unjust cultural appropriation of land, and contamination of water sources as the main reason of the protest. Mass arrests and overuse of force by the authorities has been reported to various local and international Human Rights advocacy groups.

As of January 20, 2017, there was a consensus about the Standing Rock camp: it was to be dismantled in the next 30 days (by February 19), after the local community manifested discontent by "the rampant use of drugs and alcohol at the camp", as well as blockage of roads and disorderly conduct. 

It is yet to be seen if the order will be actually executed for the construction to go underway. 

My take

Historically, Native American and First Nation citizens' rights have been trampled on; their religion stripped, their language defiled, their lands re-appropriated. Both the Dakota Access Pipeline and Pipeline XL projects continue with this historical campaign which threatens the livelihood of thousands of people. Culturally and environmentally, the projects make no sense-- aren't we trying to move away from using fossil fuels? Shouldn't there be a heightened awareness for others' cultures? In this day and age, it is still very hard to believe that the Indigenous American populations aren't recognized as the true first owners of the land, and given the respect they deserve.


                                                                            Jenni Monet

From an economic point of view, it's a mixed reaction: with increased supply from Canada (approximately 380,000 barrels of oil would be transported per day), the United States' dependency on Middle Eastern oil would be greatly eased-- a concern of the past administration that wasn't fulfilled. Furthermore, there would be more jobs created, and the increase in supply would mean lower oil prices for the consumer. 

I personally don't believe that the perpetuation of oppression (both cultural and environmental) is a fair price to pay for increased oil supply-- there are alternatives that don't include eventual resource wipeout and oppression towards minorities. Investing in clean, renewable energy would be this administration's best bet... But it's very clear that it isn't an item very close to the top of the agenda. 












8 comments:

  1. I support this! #WeAreStandingRock good post :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I actually wasn't aware what was happening to these people, thank you so much for educating me on this topic! #WeAreStandingRock

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree. Any form of oppression is not worth the increased oil supply, or any economic gains. I wish that the administration would focus on renewable energy, so it saddens me to read that the Trump administration signed this executive order. :(

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have been reading a lot about this issue lately and it is completely unfair and dangerous for the people living at standing rock. I cannot believe that after the hard fought battle that the people in standing rock endured, they are back at square one with president trump signing these executive orders. But them nor their supporters will let this happen quietly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I definitely agree with you on all fronts of this post. It is not right to take these people's land, especially when they've lost so much already, and I also think that we should be focusing our energies on finding a more renewable source of power. However, I believe that these two issues are not at all important to the Trump administration.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's a sad reality what people will do for money. Although it would have it benefits, I agree and don't think it should be built. We've already done enough to the poor Native Americans. The least we can do is stay out of what little land they have left.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Corporate greed at its finiest. Who cares about the envirnonment, or the indigenous people, that would be catapulted into destruction and despair when it takes place, right? And it's even more sad how - and i'm only making speculations here - if the people negetively impacted were wealthy white folks, and the perpetrators were not. Really good post!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I completely agree with your view points on this. The pipeline disregards the lives of people who were here long before we were, and the economic benefits don't outweigh the environmental costs. I really like your voice, and I can't wait to hear the next issue you focus on.

    ReplyDelete